Private credit has become the dominant source of mid-market debt financing in Canada. As the chartered banks have retreated to larger, simpler credits, a deep and growing ecosystem of alternative lenders has filled the gap — offering faster execution, higher leverage tolerance, and greater structural flexibility than the regulated banking sector.

For mid-market borrowers, understanding this landscape is no longer optional. The lender you choose, and how you approach them, has material implications for pricing, covenants, and your relationship with capital markets for years to come.

What Is Private Credit?

Private credit refers to debt financing provided by non-bank lenders — typically funds, insurance companies, and specialty finance firms that raise capital from institutional investors and deploy it as loans. Unlike bank lending, private credit is not regulated by OSFI, which gives these lenders significantly more flexibility on structure, leverage, and covenant terms.

In Canada, the private credit market has grown substantially since 2015, accelerated by Basel III capital requirements that pushed banks toward lower-risk, larger credits. The result is a market with genuine depth at the $5M–$75M facility level — precisely the segment where bank appetite is most constrained.

The Canadian Private Credit Ecosystem

Canadian-Domiciled Funds

The most active domestic private credit managers in the Canadian mid-market include federally-backed development finance institutions, bank-affiliated lenders, and independent private credit funds. These players understand the nuances of the Canadian market, including PPSA registration, CBCA corporate structures, and Quebec civil law considerations.

US Funds Active in Canada

A significant number of US-based private credit managers have expanded into Canada, particularly for larger mid-market transactions ($25M+). Several large US-based credit managers actively pursue Canadian opportunities that meet their criteria. They bring deep capital bases and competitive pricing on quality credits.

Specialty Lenders

Several lenders focus on specific asset classes or sectors: institutional mortgage specialists and other mortgage specialists for real estate-secured credits, royalty finance providers for revenue-based structures, and various factoring companies and ABL specialists for working capital needs.

What Private Credit Lenders Look For

Cash Flow Quality

Private credit lenders underwrite primarily to cash flow. The key metrics are EBITDA stability (ideally 3+ years of consistent generation), revenue concentration (no single customer above 20–25% for most lenders), and gross margin sustainability. Cyclical or project-based businesses face higher scrutiny.

Management Quality

Non-bank lenders have more concentrated portfolios than banks and take a more active view on management quality. Expect detailed discussion of key person risk, succession planning, and management incentive alignment. A credible management team can meaningfully improve terms.

Security Package

Most private credit facilities are secured by a first-priority General Security Agreement (GSA) over all present and after-acquired property, plus specific security over real property and key intellectual property. Some lenders require personal guarantees from controlling shareholders, though this is increasingly negotiable for established operating companies.

Approaching Private Credit Lenders

Cold outreach to private credit funds rarely produces results. These lenders receive far more deal flow than they can process, and unsolicited approaches from unfamiliar borrowers are typically deprioritized. The effective channels are:

What every private credit lender wants to see: Audited or reviewed financials for three years, a clear use of proceeds, a credible management team, and a business with defensible competitive position. The quality of your credit presentation often determines whether you get to term sheet stage.

Covenant Structures in Private Credit

Private credit facilities typically carry financial maintenance covenants tested quarterly. The most common are leverage covenants (Total Debt / EBITDA), fixed charge coverage ratios, and occasionally minimum liquidity tests. Negotiating appropriate covenant headroom — typically 20–30% cushion above base case projections — is one of the most important elements of the term sheet negotiation.

Unlike bank facilities, private credit lenders are generally more willing to engage constructively on covenant amendments when a borrower hits a tight quarter. The relationship is more bilateral, and these lenders typically prefer a proactive conversation to a technical default.

Ready to explore your financing options?

Describe your situation to our Intake Assistant and receive an assessment within 24 hours. No commitment required.

Qualify your deal →